![]() I found this definition of acoustic enhancement This makes communicating about the test results and following up after the tests easier. With these categories, doctors can describe what they find on a mammogram using the same words and terms. This system sorts mammogram results into categories numbered 0 through 6. I did this so that you can easily connect with fellow members and who are talking about Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System or BI-RADS assessment categorization. You'll notice that I moved your 2 messages to this existing discussion about BI-RADS 3. Normal appearing lymph nodes are seen in both Mass or cyst seen on mammography or sonography. Images of the real-time examination were reviewed.īREAST TISSUE DENSITY: There are scattered areas of fibroglandular density.įINDINGS: No mammographic correlate for the reported area of pain left axilla. Regions and color flow and real-time ultrasound of the left axilla were performed. ULTRASOUND: Color flow and real-time ultrasound of the right breast 11 oclock, and axilla Tomosynthesis was utilized for interpretation. ![]() TOMOSYNTHESIS: Current study was also evaluated with a Computer Aided Detection (CAD) system. is doing an u/s in 6 months in lieu of biopsy because I have cosmetic implants and we are avoiding any chance of rupture. I’m guessing they’re gone? Can anyone shed light on these findings- particularly the posterior acoustic enhancement Dr. Prior tests do not show this mass (last mammo before this one was 6/2021) – only calcifications which were scattered. A follow-up ultrasound in 6 months is recommended. The 1.5 cm x 1.1 cm x 0.4 cm oval mass in the right breast most likely is a fibroadenoma and is No other significant masses, calcifications, or other findings are seen in either breast on the Color flow imagingĭemonstrates that there is no vascularity present. This correlates with mammography findings. This oval mass displays a hyperechoic rim and posteriorĪcoustic enhancement. Ultrasoundĭemonstrates a 1.5 cm x 1.1 cm x 0.4 cm oval mass with a circumscribed margin at 11 oclock Finding is best noted on tomographic MLO slice 15. There is a 1.4 cm equal density asymmetry with an indistinct margin in the right breast at 11 Also- posterior acoustic enhancement?īilateral breast implants are stable and intact. ***The mammo says indistinct margins but u/s says circumscribed(?). Can someone read this and tell me if the results look more reassuringly benign rather than malignant? My radiologist said we can do a follow up u/s in 6 months or a biopsy, but I have implants (cosmetic) so we decided to watch it. I received this report, which is strange because it doesn’t mention my calcifications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |